1. Silica Sand
A basic and cost-effective option, silica sand infill is often used as a stabilizing base, particularly in landscape and light-traffic areas.
- Pros: Affordable, widely available, UV resistant.
- Cons: Limited shock absorption; can compact over time.
2. SBR Rubber (Recycled Tires)
One of the most common infills for sports fields.
- Pros: Excellent shock absorption, good ball rebound, cost-effective.
- Cons: Can retain heat, potential concerns over microplastic pollution and chemical leaching.
3. EPDM Rubber
Made from virgin rubber, EPDM infill offers vibrant color options and consistent performance.
- Pros: Non-toxic, durable, lower odor than SBR.
- Cons: Higher cost than SBR; still petroleum-based.
4. TPE (Thermoplastic Elastomer)
A newer, recyclable infill option for those seeking higher environmental standards.
- Pros: Recyclable, odorless, consistent shape and performance.
- Cons: More expensive, limited availability in some regions.
5. Cork
A natural and biodegradable infill sourced from tree bark.
- Pros: Renewable, lightweight, cool underfoot.
- Cons: Higher cost, prone to floatation in heavy rain unless properly stabilized.
6. BrockFILL (Engineered Wood)
An engineered organic material designed to be sustainable and cool in temperature.
- Pros: Natural feel, low heat retention, eco-friendly.
- Cons: Higher upfront cost, may require specific installation techniques.
Leave a Reply